Funding and Donations
The Action Against 5G campaign has been accepting public donations via our CrowdJustice page. However, changes to the way CJ funds have to be banked left us facing exorbitant and unsustainable monthly escrow account fees, with the result that our CJ page now shows the campaign as 'Funded'. Accordingly, we are now investigating alternative means to accept public donations, in readiness for the new…
Judicial Review Heard
Is the government informing the public of risks associated with 5G roll out?
This update is from our barrister, Philip Rule, written for his chambers' website:
On 6 and 7 February 2023 the Administrative Court heard the judicial review of the Secretary of State’s alleged failure to address the evidence of risks to human health posed by 5G technology.
No5’s Philip Rule acts for the…
Why is the Government Not Warning the Public?
250 Scientists Are Still Warning the Public about Wireless Earbuds due to Cancer, Neurological, and Other Health Risks
We at Action Against 5G are asking the government why it does not similarly warn the public and are challenging:
The failure to provide adequate or effective information to the public about the risks and how, if it be possible, it might be possible for individuals to avoid or…
News
*******UPDATE - PERMISSION GRANTED AT THE COURT OF APPEAL********
Secretary of State to be challenged on failure to give adequate information to the public about the risks of 5G and to explain the absence of a process for investigation of any adverse health effects
We are delighted to announce that the Court of Appeal has today granted permission for our case to proceed on two grounds…
How green is 5G?
We have noticed that telecoms companies seem to be branding their product as a solution to climate change, and we beg to differ.
Our fellow campaigner Sally Beare has written this overview of the likely impacts on the environment of 5G. Is 5G green, as telecoms companies claim, or has it been greenwashed? Read the evidence and decide for yourself.
Originally published in Envirotec…
Federal Court orders the FCC to explain why it ignored scientific evidence showing harm from wireless radiation
In Historic Decision, Federal Court Orders FCC to Explain Why It Ignored Scientific Evidence Showing Harm From Wireless Radiation
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit judges in favor of environmental health groups and petitioners; finds FCC violated the Administrative Procedure Act and failed to respond to comments on environmental harm.
Today , the United States…
Contact us
If you have not already done so, please check our Frequently Asked Questions page.
To register for e-mail updates, use the Sign Up form at the foot of the page.
IMPORTANT: We are overwhelmed with requests for assistance on local mast and other 5G planning objections. Unfortunately, it is beyond our small team's capacity to respond individually to such requests. Accordingly, we refer…